[SCSI] zfcp: Remove field sbal_last from trace record.

This field is not needed, because it designates an index with a fix offset
from sbal_first. It's name is confusing anyway.

Signed-off-by: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
This commit is contained in:
Martin Peschke 2008-05-19 12:17:41 +02:00 committed by James Bottomley
parent 5c9a6890de
commit 0f83b110f0
2 changed files with 0 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ void zfcp_hba_dbf_event_fsf_response(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
response->fsf_req_status = fsf_req->status;
response->sbal_first = fsf_req->sbal_first;
response->sbal_curr = fsf_req->sbal_curr;
response->sbal_last = fsf_req->sbal_last;
response->pool = fsf_req->pool != NULL;
response->erp_action = (unsigned long)fsf_req->erp_action;
@ -356,7 +355,6 @@ static void zfcp_hba_dbf_view_response(char **p,
zfcp_dbf_out(p, "fsf_req_status", "0x%08x", r->fsf_req_status);
zfcp_dbf_out(p, "sbal_first", "0x%02x", r->sbal_first);
zfcp_dbf_out(p, "sbal_curr", "0x%02x", r->sbal_curr);
zfcp_dbf_out(p, "sbal_last", "0x%02x", r->sbal_last);
zfcp_dbf_out(p, "pool", "0x%02x", r->pool);
switch (r->fsf_command) {

View File

@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ struct zfcp_hba_dbf_record_response {
u32 fsf_req_status;
u8 sbal_first;
u8 sbal_curr;
u8 sbal_last;
u8 pool;
u64 erp_action;
union {