Bluetooth: Fix sending wrong authentication requirements

Until we support any pairing method (Passkey Entry, OOB) that gives
MITM protection we shouldn't send that we have MITM protection.

Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
This commit is contained in:
Vinicius Costa Gomes 2011-08-25 20:02:27 -03:00 committed by Gustavo F. Padovan
parent 5e762444b0
commit 0fb4eb6f63
1 changed files with 2 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -187,18 +187,6 @@ static void smp_send_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code, u16 len, void *data)
msecs_to_jiffies(SMP_TIMEOUT));
}
static __u8 seclevel_to_authreq(__u8 level)
{
switch (level) {
case BT_SECURITY_HIGH:
/* Right now we don't support bonding */
return SMP_AUTH_MITM;
default:
return SMP_AUTH_NONE;
}
}
static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
struct smp_cmd_pairing *req,
struct smp_cmd_pairing *rsp,
@ -542,7 +530,6 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level)
{
struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
struct smp_chan *smp = conn->smp_chan;
__u8 authreq;
BT_DBG("conn %p hcon %p level 0x%2.2x", conn, hcon, sec_level);
@ -580,19 +567,17 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level)
smp = smp_chan_create(conn);
authreq = seclevel_to_authreq(sec_level);
if (hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER) {
struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, authreq);
build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, SMP_AUTH_NONE);
smp->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ;
memcpy(&smp->preq[1], &cp, sizeof(cp));
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
} else {
struct smp_cmd_security_req cp;
cp.auth_req = authreq;
cp.auth_req = SMP_AUTH_NONE;
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
}