userfaultfd: shmem/hugetlbfs: only allow to register VM_MAYWRITE vmas

After the VMA to register the uffd onto is found, check that it has
VM_MAYWRITE set before allowing registration.  This way we inherit all
common code checks before allowing to fill file holes in shmem and
hugetlbfs with UFFDIO_COPY.

The userfaultfd memory model is not applicable for readonly files unless
it's a MAP_PRIVATE.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181126173452.26955-4-aarcange@redhat.com
Fixes: ff62a34210 ("hugetlb: implement memfd sealing")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Fixes: 4c27fe4c4c ("userfaultfd: shmem: add shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte for userfaultfd support")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andrea Arcangeli 2018-11-30 14:09:32 -08:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 5b51072e97
commit 29ec90660d
2 changed files with 21 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -1361,6 +1361,19 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
ret = -EINVAL;
if (!vma_can_userfault(cur))
goto out_unlock;
/*
* UFFDIO_COPY will fill file holes even without
* PROT_WRITE. This check enforces that if this is a
* MAP_SHARED, the process has write permission to the backing
* file. If VM_MAYWRITE is set it also enforces that on a
* MAP_SHARED vma: there is no F_WRITE_SEAL and no further
* F_WRITE_SEAL can be taken until the vma is destroyed.
*/
ret = -EPERM;
if (unlikely(!(cur->vm_flags & VM_MAYWRITE)))
goto out_unlock;
/*
* If this vma contains ending address, and huge pages
* check alignment.
@ -1406,6 +1419,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
BUG_ON(!vma_can_userfault(vma));
BUG_ON(vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx &&
vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx != ctx);
WARN_ON(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYWRITE));
/*
* Nothing to do: this vma is already registered into this
@ -1552,6 +1566,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_unregister(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
cond_resched();
BUG_ON(!vma_can_userfault(vma));
WARN_ON(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYWRITE));
/*
* Nothing to do: this vma is already registered into this

View File

@ -205,8 +205,9 @@ retry:
if (!dst_vma || !is_vm_hugetlb_page(dst_vma))
goto out_unlock;
/*
* Only allow __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb on userfaultfd
* registered ranges.
* Check the vma is registered in uffd, this is
* required to enforce the VM_MAYWRITE check done at
* uffd registration time.
*/
if (!dst_vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx)
goto out_unlock;
@ -459,13 +460,9 @@ retry:
if (!dst_vma)
goto out_unlock;
/*
* Be strict and only allow __mcopy_atomic on userfaultfd
* registered ranges to prevent userland errors going
* unnoticed. As far as the VM consistency is concerned, it
* would be perfectly safe to remove this check, but there's
* no useful usage for __mcopy_atomic ouside of userfaultfd
* registered ranges. This is after all why these are ioctls
* belonging to the userfaultfd and not syscalls.
* Check the vma is registered in uffd, this is required to
* enforce the VM_MAYWRITE check done at uffd registration
* time.
*/
if (!dst_vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx)
goto out_unlock;