x86: memtest fix use of reserve_early()

Hi all,

Wrong usage of 2nd parameter in reserve_early call.
66/75: reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM");
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The correct way is to use 'end' address and not 'size'.
As a bonus a fix to the printk format.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Calore <orkaan@orkaan.org>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Daniele Calore 2008-10-13 10:34:12 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 746e7cef1b
commit 2cb0ebeeb6
1 changed files with 3 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ static void __init memtest(unsigned long start_phys, unsigned long size,
last_bad += incr;
} else {
if (start_bad) {
printk(KERN_CONT "\n %010lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved",
printk(KERN_CONT "\n %016lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved",
val, start_bad, last_bad + incr);
reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM");
reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad + incr, "BAD RAM");
}
start_bad = last_bad = start_phys_aligned;
}
@ -72,9 +72,8 @@ static void __init memtest(unsigned long start_phys, unsigned long size,
if (start_bad) {
printk(KERN_CONT "\n %016lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved",
val, start_bad, last_bad + incr);
reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM");
reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad + incr, "BAD RAM");
}
}
/* default is disabled */