bpf, trace: make ctx access checks more robust
Make sure that ctx cannot potentially be accessed oob by asserting
explicitly that ctx access size into pt_regs for BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE
programs must be within limits. In case some 32bit archs have pt_regs
not being a multiple of 8, then BPF_DW access could cause such access.
BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE progs don't have a ctx conversion function since
there's no extra mapping needed. kprobe_prog_is_valid_access() didn't
enforce sizeof(long) as the only allowed access size, since LLVM can
generate non BPF_W/BPF_DW access to regs from time to time.
For BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT we don't have a ctx conversion either, so
add a BUILD_BUG_ON() check to make sure that BPF_DW access will not be
a similar issue in future (ctx works on event buffer as opposed to
pt_regs there).
Fixes: 2541517c32
("tracing, perf: Implement BPF programs attached to kprobes")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
019ec0032e
commit
2d071c643f
@ -459,6 +459,13 @@ static bool kprobe_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type
|
|||||||
return false;
|
return false;
|
||||||
if (off % size != 0)
|
if (off % size != 0)
|
||||||
return false;
|
return false;
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Assertion for 32 bit to make sure last 8 byte access
|
||||||
|
* (BPF_DW) to the last 4 byte member is disallowed.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (off + size > sizeof(struct pt_regs))
|
||||||
|
return false;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return true;
|
return true;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -540,6 +547,8 @@ static bool tp_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type
|
|||||||
return false;
|
return false;
|
||||||
if (off % size != 0)
|
if (off % size != 0)
|
||||||
return false;
|
return false;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
BUILD_BUG_ON(PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE % sizeof(__u64));
|
||||||
return true;
|
return true;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user