From 2d3475c0ad625f7a43844a6cd0130d136416e604 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bryan Schumaker Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:39:56 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] NFSD: forget_delegations should use list_for_each_entry_safe Otherwise the for loop could try to use a file recently removed from the file_hashtbl list and oops. Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker Tested-by: Casey Bodley Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 19ca9b54200b..7355fe405d69 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -4505,18 +4505,19 @@ void nfsd_forget_openowners(u64 num) int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegation *)) { int i, count = 0; - struct nfs4_file *fp; - struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *next; + struct nfs4_file *fp, *fnext; + struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *dnext; for (i = 0; i < FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) { - list_for_each_entry(fp, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) { - list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, next, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) { + list_for_each_entry_safe(fp, fnext, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) { + list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) { deleg_func(dp); if (++count == num) return count; } } } + return count; }