OpenE2K
/
linux
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

selftests/bpf: make 'dubious pointer arithmetic' test useful 

mostly revert the previous workaround and make
'dubious pointer arithmetic' test useful again.
Use (ptr - ptr) << const instead of ptr << const to generate large scalar.
The rest stays as before commit 2b36047e78.

Fixes: 2b36047e78 ("selftests/bpf: fix test_align")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This commit is contained in:
Alexei Starovoitov 2018-01-23 20:05:51 -08:00 committed by Daniel Borkmann
parent 783687810e
commit 31e95b61e1
1 changed files with 23 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

30
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
View File

@ -446,11 +446,9 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
.insns = {
PREP_PKT_POINTERS,
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
/* ptr & const => unknown & const */
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_2),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_5, 0x40),
/* ptr << const => unknown << const */
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_2),
/* (ptr - ptr) << 2 */
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_3),
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_2),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_5, 2),
/* We have a (4n) value. Let's make a packet offset
* out of it. First add 14, to make it a (4n+2)
@ -473,8 +471,26 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = REJECT,
.matches = {
{4, "R5_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)"},
/* R5 bitwise operator &= on pointer prohibited */
{4, "R5_w=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0)"},
/* (ptr - ptr) << 2 == unknown, (4n) */
{6, "R5_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372036854775804,umax_value=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"},
/* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2). We blow our bounds, because
* the add could overflow.
*/
{7, "R5=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"},
/* Checked s>=0 */
{9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
/* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */
{11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
{13, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
/* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine.
* We checked the bounds, but it might have been able
* to overflow if the packet pointer started in the
* upper half of the address space.
* So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access
* attempt will fail.
*/
{15, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
}
},
{