From 35b123e2f701b28977db2cde7dbbdb3fad28cad1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreea-Cristina Bernat Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:50:43 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER() The use of "rcu_assign_pointer()" is NULLing out the pointer. According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment: "1. This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer" it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a smaller overhead. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used: @@ @@ - rcu_assign_pointer + RCU_INIT_POINTER (..., NULL) Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140822145043.GA580@ada Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index d3427a8f254b..02fc949eb348 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p) list_del(&p->numa_entry); grp->nr_tasks--; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&grp->lock, flags); - rcu_assign_pointer(p->numa_group, NULL); + RCU_INIT_POINTER(p->numa_group, NULL); put_numa_group(grp); }