From 3a129cc2151425e5aeb69aeb25fbc994ec738137 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Borowski Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 18:45:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] vsprintf: avoid misleading "(null)" for %px Like %pK already does, print "00000000" instead. This confused people -- the convention is that "(null)" means you tried to dereference a null pointer as opposed to printing the address. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180204174521.21383-1-kilobyte@angband.pl To: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Steven Rostedt To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Joe Perches Cc: Kees Cook Cc: "Roberts, William C" Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Laight Cc: Randy Dunlap Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek --- lib/vsprintf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c index 77ee6ced11b1..d7a708f82559 100644 --- a/lib/vsprintf.c +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr, { const int default_width = 2 * sizeof(void *); - if (!ptr && *fmt != 'K') { + if (!ptr && *fmt != 'K' && *fmt != 'x') { /* * Print (null) with the same width as a pointer so it makes * tabular output look nice.