OpenE2K
/
linux
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Btrfs: fix deadlock with nested trans handles 

Zach found this deadlock that would happen like this

btrfs_end_transaction <- reduce trans->use_count to 0
  btrfs_run_delayed_refs
    btrfs_cow_block
      find_free_extent
	btrfs_start_transaction <- increase trans->use_count to 1
          allocate chunk
	btrfs_end_transaction <- decrease trans->use_count to 0
	  btrfs_run_delayed_refs
	    lock tree block we are cowing above ^^

We need to only decrease trans->use_count if it is above 1, otherwise leave it
alone.  This will make nested trans be the only ones who decrease their added
ref, and will let us get rid of the trans->use_count++ hack if we have to commit
the transaction.  Thanks,

cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Tested-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
Josef Bacik 2014-03-06 19:01:07 -05:00 committed by Chris Mason
parent 573bfb72f7
commit 3bbb24b20a
1 changed files with 4 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
fs/btrfs/transaction.c
View File

@ -683,7 +683,8 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
int lock = (trans->type != TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK);
int err = 0;
if (--trans->use_count) {
if (trans->use_count > 1) {
trans->use_count--;
trans->block_rsv = trans->orig_rsv;
return 0;
}
@ -731,17 +732,10 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
}
if (lock && ACCESS_ONCE(cur_trans->state) == TRANS_STATE_BLOCKED) {
if (throttle) {
/*
* We may race with somebody else here so end up having
* to call end_transaction on ourselves again, so inc
* our use_count.
*/
trans->use_count++;
if (throttle)
return btrfs_commit_transaction(trans, root);
} else {
else
wake_up_process(info->transaction_kthread);
}
}
if (trans->type & __TRANS_FREEZABLE)