OpenE2K
/
linux
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

[CPUFREQ] cpufreq_ondemand.c: don't use _WORK_NAR 

Looks like dbs_timer() is very careful wrt per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info),
and it doesn't need the help of WORK_STRUCT_NOAUTOREL.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Oleg Nesterov 2007-02-19 00:44:07 +03:00 committed by Dave Jones
parent b077ffb3b7
commit 48ac3271e5
1 changed files with 1 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
View File

@ -432,9 +432,6 @@ static void do_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
/* We want all CPUs to do sampling nearly on same jiffy */
int delay = usecs_to_jiffies(dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate);
/* Permit rescheduling of this work item */
work_release(work);
delay -= jiffies % delay;
if (lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu) < 0)
@ -473,7 +470,7 @@ static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info)
dbs_info->enable = 1;
ondemand_powersave_bias_init();
dbs_info->sample_type = DBS_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
INIT_DELAYED_WORK_NAR(&dbs_info->work, do_dbs_timer);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dbs_info->work, do_dbs_timer);
queue_delayed_work_on(dbs_info->cpu, kondemand_wq, &dbs_info->work,
delay);
}