regulator: Reverse the disable sequence in regulator_bulk_disable()

Often there is a need for disabling a set of regulators in order opposite
to the enable order. Currently the function regulator_bulk_disable() walks
list of regulators in same order as regulator_bulk_enable(). This may cause
trouble, especially for devices with mixed analogue and digital circuits.
So reverse the disabling sequence of regulator_bulk_disable().
While at it, also correct the comment.

Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
Sylwester Nawrocki 2012-01-25 12:35:38 +01:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent dcd6c92267
commit 49e226323d
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -2463,8 +2463,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_bulk_enable);
* @return 0 on success, an errno on failure
*
* This convenience API allows consumers to disable multiple regulator
* clients in a single API call. If any consumers cannot be enabled
* then any others that were disabled will be disabled again prior to
* clients in a single API call. If any consumers cannot be disabled
* then any others that were disabled will be enabled again prior to
* return.
*/
int regulator_bulk_disable(int num_consumers,
@ -2473,7 +2473,7 @@ int regulator_bulk_disable(int num_consumers,
int i;
int ret;
for (i = 0; i < num_consumers; i++) {
for (i = num_consumers - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
ret = regulator_disable(consumers[i].consumer);
if (ret != 0)
goto err;
@ -2483,7 +2483,7 @@ int regulator_bulk_disable(int num_consumers,
err:
pr_err("Failed to disable %s: %d\n", consumers[i].supply, ret);
for (--i; i >= 0; --i)
for (++i; i < num_consumers; ++i)
regulator_enable(consumers[i].consumer);
return ret;