OpenE2K
/
linux
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

spi/amba-pl022: Fix error case return statement. 

The return -EINVAL appears to only make sense if the if branch that it is
aligned with is taken, and the indentation indicates that this is the
authors intent, so move it into that branch.

The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@r disable braces4@
position p1,p2;
statement S1,S2;
@@

(
if (...) { ... }
|
if (...) S1@p1 S2@p2
)

@script:python@
p1 << r.p1;
p2 << r.p2;
@@

if (p1[0].column == p2[0].column):
  cocci.print_main("branch",p1)
  cocci.print_secs("after",p2)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
This commit is contained in:
Julia Lawall 2010-09-29 17:31:30 +09:00 committed by Grant Likely
parent e447d3588e
commit 4a4fd47155
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
drivers/spi/amba-pl022.c
View File

@ -1350,10 +1350,11 @@ static int verify_controller_parameters(struct pl022 *pl022,
if ((chip_info->duplex !=
SSP_MICROWIRE_CHANNEL_FULL_DUPLEX)
&& (chip_info->duplex !=
SSP_MICROWIRE_CHANNEL_HALF_DUPLEX))
SSP_MICROWIRE_CHANNEL_HALF_DUPLEX)) {
dev_err(chip_info->dev,
"Microwire duplex mode is configured incorrectly\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
} else {
if (chip_info->duplex != SSP_MICROWIRE_CHANNEL_FULL_DUPLEX)
dev_err(chip_info->dev,