regulator: Remove _en_reg, _en_bit and _ops parameters from tps65090_REG macro

Both _en_bit and _ops parameters for all DCDCs and FETs are the same, so we
can hardcode it in tps65090_REG macro.

_en_reg can be calculated by _id + 12, so we can also remove it.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked by: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
Axel Lin 2012-03-24 10:57:53 +08:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent 0ca2d6e652
commit 4b3bd55f54
1 changed files with 14 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -94,31 +94,31 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
.is_enabled = tps65090_reg_is_enabled,
};
#define tps65090_REG(_id, _en_reg, _en_bit, _ops) \
#define tps65090_REG(_id) \
{ \
.reg_en_reg = _en_reg, \
.en_bit = _en_bit, \
.reg_en_reg = (TPS65090_ID_##_id) + 12, \
.en_bit = 0, \
.id = TPS65090_ID_##_id, \
.desc = { \
.name = tps65090_rails(_id), \
.id = TPS65090_ID_##_id, \
.ops = &_ops, \
.ops = &tps65090_ops, \
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
.owner = THIS_MODULE, \
}, \
}
static struct tps65090_regulator TPS65090_regulator[] = {
tps65090_REG(DCDC1, 12, 0, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG(DCDC2, 13, 0, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG(DCDC3, 14, 0, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG(FET1, 15, 0, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG(FET2, 16, 0, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG(FET3, 17, 0, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG(FET4, 18, 0, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG(FET5, 19, 0, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG(FET6, 20, 0, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG(FET7, 21, 0, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG(DCDC1),
tps65090_REG(DCDC2),
tps65090_REG(DCDC3),
tps65090_REG(FET1),
tps65090_REG(FET2),
tps65090_REG(FET3),
tps65090_REG(FET4),
tps65090_REG(FET5),
tps65090_REG(FET6),
tps65090_REG(FET7),
};
static inline struct tps65090_regulator *find_regulator_info(int id)