x86, locking: Use no more OOSTORE nonsense

Paul reported that X86_OOSTORE is dead, yay! Update a comment and
remove a newly added reference.

Reported-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140611090509.GC3588@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-11 11:01:45 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent ebe06187bf
commit 4f3aaf2c2b
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
#if defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE)
/*
* For either of these options x86 doesn't have a strong TSO memory
* For this option x86 doesn't have a strong TSO memory
* model and we should fall back to full barriers.
*/

View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
#include <asm-generic/qrwlock_types.h>
#if !defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE)
#ifndef CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE
#define queue_write_unlock queue_write_unlock
static inline void queue_write_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
{