[S390] drivers/s390/: Spelling fixes

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Joe Perches 2008-01-26 14:11:20 +01:00 committed by Martin Schwidefsky
parent 5800266a78
commit 5d67d164e6
6 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -2620,7 +2620,7 @@ dasd_3990_erp_handle_match_erp(struct dasd_ccw_req *erp_head,
* DASD_3990_ERP_ACTION
*
* DESCRIPTION
* controll routine for 3990 erp actions.
* control routine for 3990 erp actions.
* Has to be called with the queue lock (namely the s390_irq_lock) acquired.
*
* PARAMETER

View File

@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ dasd_eckd_performance(struct dasd_device *device, void __user *argp)
prssdp = (struct dasd_psf_prssd_data *) cqr->data;
memset(prssdp, 0, sizeof (struct dasd_psf_prssd_data));
prssdp->order = PSF_ORDER_PRSSD;
prssdp->suborder = 0x01; /* Perfomance Statistics */
prssdp->suborder = 0x01; /* Performance Statistics */
prssdp->varies[1] = 0x01; /* Perf Statistics for the Subsystem */
ccw = cqr->cpaddr;

View File

@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ sclp_make_buffer(void *page, unsigned short columns, unsigned short htab)
}
/*
* Return a pointer to the orignal page that has been used to create
* Return a pointer to the original page that has been used to create
* the buffer.
*/
void *

View File

@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ tape_3590_unit_check(struct tape_device *device, struct tape_request *request,
device->cdev->dev.bus_id);
return tape_3590_erp_basic(device, request, irb, -EPERM);
case 0x8013:
PRINT_WARN("(%s): Another host has priviliged access to the "
PRINT_WARN("(%s): Another host has privileged access to the "
"tape device\n", device->cdev->dev.bus_id);
PRINT_WARN("(%s): To solve the problem unload the current "
"cartridge!\n", device->cdev->dev.bus_id);

View File

@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ zfcp_erp_strategy_do_action(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)
* note: no lock in subsequent strategy routines
* (this allows these routine to call schedule, e.g.
* kmalloc with such flags or qdio_initialize & friends)
* Note: in case of timeout, the seperate strategies will fail
* Note: in case of timeout, the separate strategies will fail
* anyhow. No need for a special action. Even worse, a nameserver
* failure would not wake up waiting ports without the call.
*/

View File

@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ zfcp_qdio_sbals_wipe(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
/**
* zfcp_qdio_sbale_fill - set address and lenght in current SBALE
* zfcp_qdio_sbale_fill - set address and length in current SBALE
* on request_queue
*/
static void