sched/fair: Do not migrate if the prev_cpu is idle
wake_affine_idle() prefers to move a task to the current CPU if the wakeup is due to an interrupt. The expectation is that the interrupt data is cache hot and relevant to the waking task as well as avoiding a search. However, there is no way to determine if there was cache hot data on the previous CPU that may exceed the interrupt data. Furthermore, round-robin delivery of interrupts can migrate tasks around a socket where each CPU is under-utilised. This can interact badly with cpufreq which makes decisions based on per-cpu data. It has been observed on machines with HWP that p-states are not boosted to their maximum levels even though the workload is latency and throughput sensitive. This patch uses the previous CPU for the task if it's idle and cache-affine with the current CPU even if the current CPU is idle due to the wakup being related to the interrupt. This reduces migrations at the cost of the interrupt data not being cache hot when the task wakes. A variety of workloads were tested on various machines and no adverse impact was noticed that was outside noise. dbench on ext4 on UMA showed roughly 10% reduction in the number of CPU migrations and it is a case where interrupts are frequent for IO competions. In most cases, the difference in performance is quite small but variability is often reduced. For example, this is the result for pgbench running on a UMA machine with different numbers of clients. 4.15.0-rc9 4.15.0-rc9 baseline waprev-v1 Hmean 1 22096.28 ( 0.00%) 22734.86 ( 2.89%) Hmean 4 74633.42 ( 0.00%) 75496.77 ( 1.16%) Hmean 7 115017.50 ( 0.00%) 113030.81 ( -1.73%) Hmean 12 126209.63 ( 0.00%) 126613.40 ( 0.32%) Hmean 16 131886.91 ( 0.00%) 130844.35 ( -0.79%) Stddev 1 636.38 ( 0.00%) 417.11 ( 34.46%) Stddev 4 614.64 ( 0.00%) 583.24 ( 5.11%) Stddev 7 542.46 ( 0.00%) 435.45 ( 19.73%) Stddev 12 173.93 ( 0.00%) 171.50 ( 1.40%) Stddev 16 671.42 ( 0.00%) 680.30 ( -1.32%) CoeffVar 1 2.88 ( 0.00%) 1.83 ( 36.26%) Note that the different in performance is marginal but for low utilisation, there is less variability. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180130104555.4125-4-mgorman@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b76c4a339
commit
806486c377
|
@ -5700,9 +5700,15 @@ wake_affine_idle(int this_cpu, int prev_cpu, int sync)
|
||||||
* context. Only allow the move if cache is shared. Otherwise an
|
* context. Only allow the move if cache is shared. Otherwise an
|
||||||
* interrupt intensive workload could force all tasks onto one
|
* interrupt intensive workload could force all tasks onto one
|
||||||
* node depending on the IO topology or IRQ affinity settings.
|
* node depending on the IO topology or IRQ affinity settings.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* If the prev_cpu is idle and cache affine then avoid a migration.
|
||||||
|
* There is no guarantee that the cache hot data from an interrupt
|
||||||
|
* is more important than cache hot data on the prev_cpu and from
|
||||||
|
* a cpufreq perspective, it's better to have higher utilisation
|
||||||
|
* on one CPU.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
if (idle_cpu(this_cpu) && cpus_share_cache(this_cpu, prev_cpu))
|
if (idle_cpu(this_cpu) && cpus_share_cache(this_cpu, prev_cpu))
|
||||||
return this_cpu;
|
return idle_cpu(prev_cpu) ? prev_cpu : this_cpu;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (sync && cpu_rq(this_cpu)->nr_running == 1)
|
if (sync && cpu_rq(this_cpu)->nr_running == 1)
|
||||||
return this_cpu;
|
return this_cpu;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue