[XFRM]: Fix xfrm_state_num going negative.

Missing counter bump when hashing in a new ACQ
xfrm_state.

Now that we have two spots to do the hash grow
check, break it out into a helper function.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
David S. Miller 2006-10-12 22:03:24 -07:00
parent 4663afe2c8
commit 918049f013
1 changed files with 13 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -614,6 +614,14 @@ out:
return x;
}
static void xfrm_hash_grow_check(int have_hash_collision)
{
if (have_hash_collision &&
(xfrm_state_hmask + 1) < xfrm_state_hashmax &&
xfrm_state_num > xfrm_state_hmask)
schedule_work(&xfrm_hash_work);
}
static void __xfrm_state_insert(struct xfrm_state *x)
{
unsigned int h;
@ -642,10 +650,7 @@ static void __xfrm_state_insert(struct xfrm_state *x)
xfrm_state_num++;
if (x->bydst.next != NULL &&
(xfrm_state_hmask + 1) < xfrm_state_hashmax &&
xfrm_state_num > xfrm_state_hmask)
schedule_work(&xfrm_hash_work);
xfrm_hash_grow_check(x->bydst.next != NULL);
}
/* xfrm_state_lock is held */
@ -753,6 +758,10 @@ static struct xfrm_state *__find_acq_core(unsigned short family, u8 mode, u32 re
h = xfrm_src_hash(daddr, saddr, family);
hlist_add_head(&x->bysrc, xfrm_state_bysrc+h);
wake_up(&km_waitq);
xfrm_state_num++;
xfrm_hash_grow_check(x->bydst.next != NULL);
}
return x;