x86/tsc: Skip TSC test and error messages if already unstable
If the TSC has already been determined to be unstable, then checking TSC ADJUST values is a waste of time and generates unnecessary error messages. Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com> Reviewed-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Banman <andrew.banman@hpe.com> Cc: Bin Gao <bin.gao@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171012163202.060777495@stormcage.americas.sgi.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
341102c3ef
commit
9514ececa5
|
@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ void tsc_verify_tsc_adjust(bool resume)
|
|||
if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Skip unnecessary error messages if TSC already unstable */
|
||||
if (check_tsc_unstable())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Rate limit the MSR check */
|
||||
if (!resume && time_before(jiffies, adj->nextcheck))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
@ -114,6 +118,10 @@ bool __init tsc_store_and_check_tsc_adjust(bool bootcpu)
|
|||
if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Skip unnecessary error messages if TSC already unstable */
|
||||
if (check_tsc_unstable())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST, bootval);
|
||||
cur->bootval = bootval;
|
||||
cur->nextcheck = jiffies + HZ;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue