From 99d84bf8c65a7a0dbc9e166ca0a58ed949ac4f37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 20:36:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] stop_machine: Fix stop_cpus_in_progress ordering Make sure the entire for loop has stop_cpus_in_progress set. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Aaron Lu Cc: Valentin Schneider Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld Cc: Julien Desfossez Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0fd8fd4b99b9b9aa88d8b2dff897f7fd0d88f72c.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com --- kernel/stop_machine.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c index b4f83f7bdf86..c7031a22aa7b 100644 --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c @@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ static bool queue_stop_cpus_work(const struct cpumask *cpumask, */ preempt_disable(); stop_cpus_in_progress = true; + barrier(); for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) { work = &per_cpu(cpu_stopper.stop_work, cpu); work->fn = fn; @@ -391,6 +392,7 @@ static bool queue_stop_cpus_work(const struct cpumask *cpumask, if (cpu_stop_queue_work(cpu, work)) queued = true; } + barrier(); stop_cpus_in_progress = false; preempt_enable();