mfd: intel-lpss: Fix too early PM enablement in the ACPI ->probe()
commit c9e143084d1a602f829115612e1ec79df3727c8b upstream.
The runtime PM callback may be called as soon as the runtime PM facility
is enabled and activated. It means that ->suspend() may be called before
we finish probing the device in the ACPI case. Hence, NULL pointer
dereference:
intel-lpss INT34BA:00: IRQ index 0 not found
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030
...
Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
RIP: 0010:intel_lpss_suspend+0xb/0x40 [intel_lpss]
To fix this, first try to register the device and only after that enable
runtime PM facility.
Fixes: 4b45efe852
("mfd: Add support for Intel Sunrisepoint LPSS devices")
Reported-by: Orlando Chamberlain <redecorating@protonmail.com>
Reported-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211101190008.86473-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d08a0a88db
commit
ada3805f14
@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static int intel_lpss_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct intel_lpss_platform_info *info;
|
||||
const struct acpi_device_id *id;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
id = acpi_match_device(intel_lpss_acpi_ids, &pdev->dev);
|
||||
if (!id)
|
||||
@ -115,10 +116,14 @@ static int intel_lpss_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
info->mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
|
||||
info->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = intel_lpss_probe(&pdev->dev, info);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
|
||||
pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
|
||||
|
||||
return intel_lpss_probe(&pdev->dev, info);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int intel_lpss_acpi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user