rtmutex: Clarify the boost/deboost part

upstream commit: a57594a13a

Add a separate local variable for the boost/deboost logic to make the
code more readable. Add comments where appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Conflicts:
	kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner 2014-05-22 03:25:54 +00:00 committed by Alibek Omarov
parent 5c1c8184e8
commit af64a14546
1 changed files with 48 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -366,9 +366,10 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter,
struct task_struct *top_task)
{
struct rt_mutex *lock;
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter;
struct rt_mutex_waiter *prerequeue_top_waiter;
int detect_deadlock, ret = 0, depth = 0;
struct rt_mutex *lock;
unsigned long flags;
detect_deadlock = debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
@ -475,9 +476,14 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
goto out_unlock_pi;
}
top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
/*
* Store the current top waiter before doing the requeue
* operation on @lock. We need it for the boost/deboost
* decision below.
*/
prerequeue_top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
/* Requeue the waiter */
/* Requeue the waiter in the lock waiter list. */
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
waiter->prio = task->prio;
rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
@ -486,6 +492,11 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
put_task_struct(task);
/*
* We must abort the chain walk if there is no lock owner even
* in the dead lock detection case, as we have nothing to
* follow here. This is the end of the chain we are walking.
*/
if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
struct rt_mutex_waiter *lock_top_waiter;
@ -494,29 +505,48 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
* to wake the new top waiter up to try to get the lock.
*/
lock_top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
if (top_waiter != lock_top_waiter)
if (prerequeue_top_waiter != lock_top_waiter)
rt_mutex_wake_waiter(lock_top_waiter);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
return 0;
}
/* Grab the next task */
/* Grab the next task, i.e. the owner of @lock */
task = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
get_task_struct(task);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
/* Boost the owner */
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, top_waiter);
/*
* The waiter became the new top (highest priority)
* waiter on the lock. Replace the previous top waiter
* in the owner tasks pi waiters list with this waiter
* and adjust the priority of the owner.
*/
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
} else if (top_waiter == waiter) {
/* Deboost the owner */
} else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
/*
* The waiter was the top waiter on the lock, but is
* no longer the top prority waiter. Replace waiter in
* the owner tasks pi waiters list with the new top
* (highest priority) waiter and adjust the priority
* of the owner.
* The new top waiter is stored in @waiter so that
* @waiter == @top_waiter evaluates to true below and
* we continue to deboost the rest of the chain.
*/
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
} else {
/*
* Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
* adjustment.
*/
}
/*
@ -529,6 +559,10 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
/*
* Store the top waiter of @lock for the end of chain walk
* decision below.
*/
top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
@ -539,6 +573,11 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
if (!next_lock)
goto out_put_task;
/*
* If the current waiter is not the top waiter on the lock,
* then we can stop the chain walk here if we are not in full
* deadlock detection mode.
*/
if (!detect_deadlock && waiter != top_waiter)
goto out_put_task;