Smack: Mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "No break" with a proper "Fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Warning level 2 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115051 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dcb569cf6a
commit
b1fed3edc8
|
@ -3474,7 +3474,7 @@ static void smack_d_instantiate(struct dentry *opt_dentry, struct inode *inode)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
final = &smack_known_star;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* No break.
|
||||
* Fall through.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If a smack value has been set we want to use it,
|
||||
* but since tmpfs isn't giving us the opportunity
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue