From b5c0ce7bd1848892e2930f481828b6d7750231ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick Bellasi Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 14:54:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Add lsub_positive() and use it consistently The following pattern: var -= min_t(typeof(var), var, val); is used multiple times in fair.c. The existing sub_positive() already captures that pattern, but it also adds an explicit load-store to properly support lockless observations. In other cases the pattern above is used to update local, and/or not concurrently accessed, variables. Let's add a simpler version of sub_positive(), targeted at local variables updates, which gives the same readability benefits at calling sites, without enforcing {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() barriers. Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Morten Rasmussen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Quentin Perret Cc: Steve Muckle Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Todd Kjos Cc: Vincent Guittot Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181031184527.GA3178@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 28ee60cabba1..2cac9a469df4 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -2734,6 +2734,17 @@ account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) WRITE_ONCE(*ptr, res); \ } while (0) +/* + * Remove and clamp on negative, from a local variable. + * + * A variant of sub_positive(), which does not use explicit load-store + * and is thus optimized for local variable updates. + */ +#define lsub_positive(_ptr, _val) do { \ + typeof(_ptr) ptr = (_ptr); \ + *ptr -= min_t(typeof(*ptr), *ptr, _val); \ +} while (0) + #ifdef CONFIG_SMP static inline void enqueue_runnable_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) @@ -4639,7 +4650,7 @@ static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun) cfs_b->distribute_running = 0; throttled = !list_empty(&cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq); - cfs_b->runtime -= min(runtime, cfs_b->runtime); + lsub_positive(&cfs_b->runtime, runtime); } /* @@ -4773,7 +4784,7 @@ static void do_sched_cfs_slack_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock); if (expires == cfs_b->runtime_expires) - cfs_b->runtime -= min(runtime, cfs_b->runtime); + lsub_positive(&cfs_b->runtime, runtime); cfs_b->distribute_running = 0; raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock); } @@ -6240,7 +6251,7 @@ static unsigned long cpu_util_without(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) util = READ_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.util_avg); /* Discount task's util from CPU's util */ - util -= min_t(unsigned int, util, task_util(p)); + lsub_positive(&util, task_util(p)); /* * Covered cases: @@ -6289,10 +6300,9 @@ static unsigned long cpu_util_without(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) * properly fix the execl regression and it helps in further * reducing the chances for the above race. */ - if (unlikely(task_on_rq_queued(p) || current == p)) { - estimated -= min_t(unsigned int, estimated, - _task_util_est(p)); - } + if (unlikely(task_on_rq_queued(p) || current == p)) + lsub_positive(&estimated, _task_util_est(p)); + util = max(util, estimated); }