From c9601247f8f3fdc18aed7ed7e490e8dfcd07f122 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vince Weaver Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:47:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86: Fix intel QPI uncore event definitions John McCalpin reports that the "drs_data" and "ncb_data" QPI uncore events are missing the "extra bit" and always return zero values unless the bit is properly set. More details from him: According to the Xeon E5-2600 Product Family Uncore Performance Monitoring Guide, Table 2-94, about 1/2 of the QPI Link Layer events (including the ones that "perf" calls "drs_data" and "ncb_data") require that the "extra bit" be set. This was confusing for a while -- a note at the bottom of page 94 says that the "extra bit" is bit 16 of the control register. Unfortunately, Table 2-86 clearly says that bit 16 is reserved and must be zero. Looking around a bit, I found that bit 21 appears to be the correct "extra bit", and further investigation shows that "perf" actually agrees with me: [root@c560-003.stampede]# cat /sys/bus/event_source/devices/uncore_qpi_0/format/event config:0-7,21 So the command # perf -e "uncore_qpi_0/event=drs_data/" Is the same as # perf -e "uncore_qpi_0/event=0x02,umask=0x08/" While it should be # perf -e "uncore_qpi_0/event=0x102,umask=0x08/" I confirmed that this last version gives results that agree with the amount of data that I expected the STREAM benchmark to move across the QPI link in the second (cross-chip) test of the original script. Reported-by: John McCalpin Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver Cc: zheng.z.yan@intel.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.10.1308021037280.26119@vincent-weaver-1.um.maine.edu Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c index cad791dbde95..1fb6c72717bd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c @@ -314,8 +314,8 @@ static struct uncore_event_desc snbep_uncore_imc_events[] = { static struct uncore_event_desc snbep_uncore_qpi_events[] = { INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(clockticks, "event=0x14"), INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(txl_flits_active, "event=0x00,umask=0x06"), - INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(drs_data, "event=0x02,umask=0x08"), - INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(ncb_data, "event=0x03,umask=0x04"), + INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(drs_data, "event=0x102,umask=0x08"), + INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(ncb_data, "event=0x103,umask=0x04"), { /* end: all zeroes */ }, }; From 0499bd867bd17c0a88963551a1583b8efc7b03d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andi Kleen Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:26:23 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86: Add Haswell ULT model number used in Macbook Air and other systems This one was missed earlier. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1376007983-31616-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c index fbc9210b45bc..a45d8d4ace10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c @@ -2270,6 +2270,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void) case 70: case 71: case 63: + case 69: x86_pmu.late_ack = true; memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, snb_hw_cache_event_ids, sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids)); memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, snb_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));