bpf: Fix SO_RCVBUF/SO_SNDBUF handling in _bpf_setsockopt().

[ Upstream commit 04c350b1ae6bdb12b84009a4d0bf5ab4e621c47b ]

The commit 4057765f2d ("sock: consistent handling of extreme
SO_SNDBUF/SO_RCVBUF values") added a change to prevent underflow
in setsockopt() around SO_SNDBUF/SO_RCVBUF.

This patch adds the same change to _bpf_setsockopt().

Fixes: 4057765f2d ("sock: consistent handling of extreme SO_SNDBUF/SO_RCVBUF values")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220104013153.97906-2-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kuniyuki Iwashima 2022-01-04 10:31:48 +09:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 4e8307203d
commit c7a99af48c
1 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -4248,12 +4248,14 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_setsockopt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
switch (optname) {
case SO_RCVBUF:
val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_rmem_max);
val = min_t(int, val, INT_MAX / 2);
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK;
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf,
max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF));
break;
case SO_SNDBUF:
val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_wmem_max);
val = min_t(int, val, INT_MAX / 2);
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK;
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_sndbuf,
max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF));