pinctrl: lpc18xx: mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292308 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292309 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1309546 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357369 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357389 ("Missing break in switch") Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
375fef5916
commit
d290e096d2
|
@ -844,8 +844,11 @@ static int lpc18xx_pconf_get_pin(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned param,
|
|||
*arg = (reg & LPC18XX_SCU_PIN_EHD_MASK) >> LPC18XX_SCU_PIN_EHD_POS;
|
||||
switch (*arg) {
|
||||
case 3: *arg += 5;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 2: *arg += 5;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 1: *arg += 3;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 0: *arg += 4;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -1060,8 +1063,11 @@ static int lpc18xx_pconf_set_pin(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned param,
|
|||
|
||||
switch (param_val) {
|
||||
case 20: param_val -= 5;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 14: param_val -= 5;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 8: param_val -= 3;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 4: param_val -= 4;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue