OpenE2K
/
linux
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

x86: Fix assert syntax in vmlinux.lds.S 

Older versions of binutils did not accept the naked "ASSERT" syntax;
it is considered an expression whose value needs to be assigned to
something.

Reported-tested-and-fixed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
This commit is contained in:
H. Peter Anvin 2009-08-03 14:44:54 -07:00
parent 6a7bbd57ed
commit d2ba8b211b
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
View File

@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ SECTIONS
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
ASSERT((_end - LOAD_OFFSET <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
"kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE")
. = ASSERT((_end - LOAD_OFFSET <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
"kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE");
#else
/*
* Per-cpu symbols which need to be offset from __per_cpu_load
@ -407,12 +407,12 @@ INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_union);
/*
* Build-time check on the image size:
*/
ASSERT((_end - _text <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
"kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE")
. = ASSERT((_end - _text <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
"kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE");
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
ASSERT((per_cpu__irq_stack_union == 0),
"irq_stack_union is not at start of per-cpu area");
. = ASSERT((per_cpu__irq_stack_union == 0),
"irq_stack_union is not at start of per-cpu area");
#endif
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ ASSERT((per_cpu__irq_stack_union == 0),
#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
#include <asm/kexec.h>
ASSERT(kexec_control_code_size <= KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE,
"kexec control code size is too big")
. = ASSERT(kexec_control_code_size <= KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE,
"kexec control code size is too big");
#endif