drm/radeon: gcc fixes for sumo dpm

Newer versions of gcc seem to wander off into the
weeds when dealing with variable sizes arrays in
structs.  Rather than indexing the arrays, use
pointer arithmetic.

See bugs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66932
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66972
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66945

Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alex Deucher 2013-08-20 18:59:41 -04:00
parent bdcc031bc7
commit d5222ae7ad
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1483,6 +1483,7 @@ static int sumo_parse_power_table(struct radeon_device *rdev)
rdev->pm.dpm.backbias_response_time = le16_to_cpu(power_info->pplib.usBackbiasTime);
rdev->pm.dpm.voltage_response_time = le16_to_cpu(power_info->pplib.usVoltageTime);
for (i = 0; i < state_array->ucNumEntries; i++) {
u8 *idx;
power_state = (union pplib_power_state *)power_state_offset;
non_clock_array_index = power_state->v2.nonClockInfoIndex;
non_clock_info = (struct _ATOM_PPLIB_NONCLOCK_INFO *)
@ -1496,12 +1497,15 @@ static int sumo_parse_power_table(struct radeon_device *rdev)
}
rdev->pm.dpm.ps[i].ps_priv = ps;
k = 0;
idx = (u8 *)&power_state->v2.clockInfoIndex[0];
for (j = 0; j < power_state->v2.ucNumDPMLevels; j++) {
clock_array_index = power_state->v2.clockInfoIndex[j];
clock_array_index = idx[j];
if (k >= SUMO_MAX_HARDWARE_POWERLEVELS)
break;
clock_info = (union pplib_clock_info *)
&clock_info_array->clockInfo[clock_array_index * clock_info_array->ucEntrySize];
((u8 *)&clock_info_array->clockInfo[0] +
(clock_array_index * clock_info_array->ucEntrySize));
sumo_parse_pplib_clock_info(rdev,
&rdev->pm.dpm.ps[i], k,
clock_info);