From d550e81dc0ddc04f1b417c179c214103a28e0ee8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 05:57:10 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] timers: Reduce __run_timers() latency for empty list The __run_timers() function currently steps through the list one jiffy at a time in order to update the timer wheel. However, if the timer wheel is empty, no adjustment is needed other than updating ->timer_jiffies. In this case, which is likely to be common for NO_HZ_FULL kernels, the kernel currently incurs a large latency for no good reason. This commit therefore short-circuits this case. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt Tested-by: Mike Galbraith --- kernel/timer.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c index fdc43834f3af..c8bc7091d8f3 100644 --- a/kernel/timer.c +++ b/kernel/timer.c @@ -338,6 +338,20 @@ void set_timer_slack(struct timer_list *timer, int slack_hz) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_timer_slack); +/* + * If the list is empty, catch up ->timer_jiffies to the current time. + * The caller must hold the tvec_base lock. Returns true if the list + * was empty and therefore ->timer_jiffies was updated. + */ +static bool catchup_timer_jiffies(struct tvec_base *base) +{ + if (!base->all_timers) { + base->timer_jiffies = jiffies; + return true; + } + return false; +} + static void __internal_add_timer(struct tvec_base *base, struct timer_list *timer) { @@ -1150,6 +1164,10 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct tvec_base *base) struct timer_list *timer; spin_lock_irq(&base->lock); + if (catchup_timer_jiffies(base)) { + spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock); + return; + } while (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->timer_jiffies)) { struct list_head work_list; struct list_head *head = &work_list;