[PATCH] x86-64/i386: Revert cpuinfo siblings behaviour back to 2.6.10

Only display physical id/siblings when there are siblings or dual core.

In 2.6.11 I accidentially broke it and it was always displaying these
fields But for compatibility to all these /proc parsers around it is better
to do it in the old way again.  

Noticed by Suresh Siddha

Cc: <Suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andi Kleen 2005-04-16 15:24:51 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent e09b8c0b20
commit db46868128
2 changed files with 11 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -94,8 +94,11 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0)
seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[n]);
seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n", c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings);
if (c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings > 1) {
seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[n]);
seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings);
}
#endif
/* We use exception 16 if we have hardware math and we've either seen it or the CPU claims it is internal */

View File

@ -1113,8 +1113,12 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[c - cpu_data]);
seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n", c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings);
if (smp_num_siblings * c->x86_num_cores > 1) {
int cpu = c - cpu_data;
seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[cpu]);
seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings);
}
#endif
seq_printf(m,