omap: Fix gpio_resume_after_retention

For omap4 case, this was wrongly writing GPIO_LEVELDETECTx
registers with OMAP24XX_ offset and OMAP4_ offset.

Bug introduced in commit:

  commit 3f1686a9bf
  Author: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
  Date:   Mon Feb 15 09:27:25 2010 -0800

      omap: Fix gpio.c for multi-omap for omap4

Signed-off-by: Sergio Aguirre <saaguirre@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
This commit is contained in:
Sergio Aguirre 2010-03-03 16:21:08 +00:00 committed by Tony Lindgren
parent 228893f9d2
commit f00d649703
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -2140,18 +2140,18 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_retention(void)
if (gen) {
u32 old0, old1;
if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
old0 = __raw_readl(bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
old1 = __raw_readl(bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
__raw_writel(old0 | gen, bank->base +
__raw_writel(old0 | gen, bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
__raw_writel(old1 | gen, bank->base +
__raw_writel(old1 | gen, bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
__raw_writel(old0, bank->base +
__raw_writel(old0, bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
__raw_writel(old1, bank->base +
__raw_writel(old1, bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
}