OpenE2K
/
linux
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

vcs: fasync(): make it consistent with poll() 

We use POLLPRI not POLLIN to wait for data with poll() as there is
never any incoming data stream per se. Let's use the same semantic
with fasync() for consistency, including the fact that a vt may go away.

No known user space ever relied on the SIGIO reason so far, let alone
FASYNC, so the risk of breakage is pretty much nonexistent.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Nicolas Pitre 2019-01-08 22:55:04 -05:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 1bf931ab94
commit fad08b205c
1 changed files with 11 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
View File

@ -93,9 +93,18 @@ vcs_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long code, void *_param)
struct vcs_poll_data *poll =
container_of(nb, struct vcs_poll_data, notifier);
int currcons = poll->cons_num;
int fa_band;
if (code != VT_UPDATE && code != VT_DEALLOCATE)
switch (code) {
case VT_UPDATE:
fa_band = POLL_PRI;
break;
case VT_DEALLOCATE:
fa_band = POLL_HUP;
break;
default:
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
if (currcons == 0)
currcons = fg_console;
@ -106,7 +115,7 @@ vcs_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long code, void *_param)
poll->event = code;
wake_up_interruptible(&poll->waitq);
kill_fasync(&poll->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
kill_fasync(&poll->fasync, SIGIO, fa_band);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}