Currently, for every ARC kernel build I see the following:
--------------->8-----------------
DTB arch/arc/boot/dts/angel4.dtb.S
AS arch/arc/boot/dts/angel4.dtb.o
LD arch/arc/boot/dts/built-in.o
rm arch/arc/boot/dts/angel4.dtb.S <-- forces rebuild next iter
CHK kernel/config_data.h
--------------->8-----------------
This is because *.dts.S is intermediate file in dtb generation and is by
default deleted by make which needs a ".SECONDARY" hint to NOT do so.
This could have ideally been done in scripts/Makefile.lib - for benefit
of all, however .SECONDARY doesn't seem to work with wildcards.
Thanks to Stephen for suggesting .SECONDARY (vs .PRECIOUS) and making
that work using a non wildcard version in arch makefile.
Thanks to James Hogan for pointing out that *.dtb.S now needs to be
added to clean-files
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
* arc-uart platform device now populated dynamically, using
of_platform_populate() - applies to any other device whatsoever.
* uart in turn requires incore arc-intc to be also present in DT
* A irq-domain needs to be instantiated for IRQ requests by DT probed
device (e.g. arc-uart)
TODO: switch over to linear irq domain once all devs have been
transitioned to DT
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
This is minimal infrastructure needed for devicetree work.
It uses an a sample "skeleton" devicetree - embedded in kernel image -
to print the board, manufacturer by parsing the top-level "compatible"
string.
As of now we don't need any additional "board" specific "machine_desc".
TODO: support interpreting the command line as boot-loader passed dtb
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Vineet Gupta