As all parameters are passed via DVBv5 to the frontends, there's
no need to pass them again via fops. Also, most drivers weren't using
it anyway. So, instead, just pass a parameter to indicate if the
hardware algorithm wants the driver to re-tune or not.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were
designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5
cache information.
Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops
struct.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Creates a DVBv5 get_frontend call, renaming the DVBv3 one to
get_frontend_legacy(), while not all frontends are converted.
After the conversion for all drivers, get_frontend_legacy()
will be removed.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Passing DVBv3 parameters to set_frontend is not fun, as the
core doesn't have any way to know if the driver is using the
v3 or v5 parameters. So, rename the callback and add a new
one to allow distinguish between a mixed v3/v5 paramenter call
from a pure v5 call.
After having all frontends to use the new way, the legacy
call can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
On our tests with Leadership ISDBT, the s921 frontend were not work. As its
design contained some weird things, it ended to be easier to just re-write
it, getting another frontend as an example (cx24123).
As the old s921 driver weren't used, there's no regression. Some info from
the old frontend were used as a way to double check the behavior that were
noticed on the USB dumps retrieved from Leadership driver.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Mauro Carvalho Chehab