Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andi Kleen fa18f477d0 [PATCH] x86: Add acpi_user_timer_override option for Asus boards
Timer overrides are normally disabled on Nvidia board because
they are commonly wrong, except on new ones with HPET support.
Unfortunately there are quite some Asus boards around that
don't have HPET, but need a timer override.

We don't know yet how to handle this transparently,
but at least add a command line option to force the timer override
and let them boot.

Cc: len.brown@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
2006-11-14 16:57:46 +01:00
Rusty Russell 1a3f239ddf [PATCH] i386: Replace i386 open-coded cmdline parsing with
This patch replaces the open-coded early commandline parsing
throughout the i386 boot code with the generic mechanism (already used
by ppc, powerpc, ia64 and s390).  The code was inconsistent with
whether it deletes the option from the cmdline or not, meaning some of
these will get passed through the environment into init.

This transformation is mainly mechanical, but there are some notable
parts:

1) Grammar: s/linux never set's it up/linux never sets it up/

2) Remove hacked-in earlyprintk= option scanning.  When someone
   actually implements CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK, then they can use
   early_param().
[AK: actually it is implemented, but I'm adding the early_param it in the next
x86-64 patch]

3) Move declaration of generic_apic_probe() from setup.c into asm/apic.h

4) Various parameters now moved into their appropriate files (thanks Andi).

5) All parse functions which examine arg need to check for NULL,
   except one where it has subtle humor value.

AK: readded acpi_sci handling which was completely dropped
AK: moved some more variables into acpi/boot.c

Cc: len.brown@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
2006-09-26 10:52:32 +02:00
Herbert Poetzl 152475cb0a [PATCH] don't call check_acpi_pci() on x86 with ACPI disabled
check_acpi_pci() is called from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c even if
CONFIG_ACPI is not defined, but the code in include/asm/acpi.h doesn't
provide it in this case.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Pötzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-22 07:53:54 -08:00
Venkatesh Pallipadi 05131ecc99 [ACPI] Avoid BIOS inflicted crashes by evaluating _PDC only once
Linux invokes the AML _PDC method (Processor Driver Capabilities)
to tell the BIOS what features it can handle.  While the ACPI
spec says nothing about the OS invoking _PDC multiple times,
doing so with changing bits seems to hopelessly confuse the BIOS
on multiple platforms up to and including crashing the system.

Factor out the _PDC invocation so Linux invokes it only once.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5483

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-12-01 01:30:35 -05:00
Len Brown 6153df7b2f [ACPI] delete CONFIG_ACPI_PCI
Delete the ability to build an ACPI kernel that does
not include PCI support.  When such a machine is created
and it requires a tuned kernel, send a patch.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1364

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-08-25 12:40:44 -04:00
Len Brown 888ba6c62b [ACPI] delete CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT
it has been a synonym for CONFIG_ACPI since 2.6.12

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-08-24 12:08:54 -04:00
Venkatesh Pallipadi 02df8b9385 [ACPI] enable C2 and C3 idle power states on SMP
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4401

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-07-12 00:14:36 -04:00
Linus Torvalds 1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00