Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lu Baolu be9e6598ae iommu/vt-d: Handle memory shortage on pasid table allocation
Pasid table memory allocation could return failure due to memory
shortage. Limit the pasid table size to 1MiB because current 8MiB
contiguous physical memory allocation can be hard to come by. W/o
a PASID table, the device could continue to work with only shared
virtual memory impacted. So, let's go ahead with context mapping
even the memory allocation for pasid table failed.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107783
Fixes: cc580e4126 ("iommu/vt-d: Per PCI device pasid table interfaces")

Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Pelton Kyle D <kyle.d.pelton@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2018-09-25 14:33:02 +02:00
Lu Baolu cc580e4126 iommu/vt-d: Per PCI device pasid table interfaces
This patch adds the interfaces for per PCI device pasid
table management. Currently we allocate one pasid table
for all PCI devices under the scope of an IOMMU. It's
insecure in some cases where multiple devices under one
single IOMMU unit support PASID features. With per PCI
device pasid table, we can achieve finer protection and
isolation granularity.

Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2018-07-20 14:44:24 +02:00
Lu Baolu 562831747f iommu/vt-d: Global PASID name space
This adds the system wide PASID name space for the PASID
allocation. Currently we are using per IOMMU PASID name
spaces which are not suitable for some use cases. For an
example, one application (associated with a PASID) might
talk to two physical devices simultaneously while the two
devices could reside behind two different IOMMU units.

Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2018-07-20 14:44:23 +02:00