Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rajesh Shah cc57450f5c [PATCH] acpi bridge hotadd: Prevent duplicate bus numbers when scanning PCI bridge
When hot-plugging a root bridge, as we try to assign bus numbers we may find
that the hotplugged hieratchy has more PCI to PCI bridges (i.e.  bus
requirements) than available.  Make sure we don't step over an existing bus
when that happens.

Signed-off-by: Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2005-06-27 21:52:40 -07:00
Rajesh Shah c431ada45d [PATCH] acpi bridge hotadd: ACPI based root bridge hot-add
When you hot-plug a (root) bridge hierarchy, it may have p2p bridges and
devices attached to it that have not been configured by firmware.  In this
case, we need to configure the devices before starting them.  This patch
separates device start from device scan so that we can introduce the
configuration step in the middle.

I kept the existing semantics for pci_scan_bus() since there are a huge number
of callers to that function.

Also, I have no way of testing the changes I made to the parisc files, so this
needs review by those folks.  Sorry for the massive cross-post, this touches
files in many different places.

Signed-off-by: Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2005-06-27 21:52:39 -07:00
Olof Johansson f797f9cc54 [PATCH] Fix PCI BAR size interpretation on 64-bit arches
On 64-bit machines, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK and other mask constants
passed to pci_size() are 64-bit (for example ~0x0fUL).  However, pci_size
does comparisons between the u32 arguments and the mask, which will fail
even though any result from pci_size is still just 32-bit.

Changing the mask argument to u32 seems the obvious thing to do, since all
arithmetic in the function is 32-bit and having a larger mask makes no
sense.

This triggered on a PPC64 system here where an adapter (VGA, as it
happened) had a memory region base of 0xfe000000 and a sz of the same,
matching the if (max == maxbase ...) test at the bottom of pci_size but
failing the mask comparison.  Quite a corner case which I guess explains
why we haven't seen it until now.

Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-13 20:58:58 -07:00
Greg KH bc56b9e011 [PATCH] PCI: Clean up a lot of sparse "Should it be static?" warnings.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2005-05-03 23:45:14 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00