Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yan, Zheng b1ee94aa59 ceph: include the initial ACL in create/mkdir/mknod MDS requests
Current code set new file/directory's initial ACL in a non-atomic
manner.
Client first sends request to MDS to create new file/directory, then set
the initial ACL after the new file/directory is successfully created.

The fix is include the initial ACL in create/mkdir/mknod MDS requests.
So MDS can handle creating file/directory and setting the initial ACL in
one request.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zyan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
2014-10-14 12:56:49 -07:00
Yan, Zheng f5f1864743 ceph: properly apply umask when ACL is enabled
when ACL is enabled, posix_acl_create() may change inode's mode

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
2014-07-08 15:08:47 +04:00
Zhang Zhen 979d4c1895 ceph: remove useless ACL check
posix_acl_xattr_set() already does the check, and it's the only
way to feed in an ACL from userspace.
So the check here is useless, remove it.

Signed-off-by: zhang zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
2014-06-06 09:29:50 +08:00
Guangliang Zhao c969d9bf91 ceph: make ceph_forget_all_cached_acls() static inline
Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao <lucienchao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
2014-02-17 12:37:12 -08:00
Yan, Zheng 7a92d64760 ceph: fix ceph_set_acl()
If acl is equivalent to file mode permission bits, ceph_set_acl()
needs to remove any existing acl xattr. Use __ceph_setxattr() to
handle both setting and removing acl xattr cases, it doesn't return
-ENODATA when there is no acl xattr.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
2014-02-17 12:37:11 -08:00
Sage Weil 77516dc92a ceph: fix missing dput in ceph_set_acl
Add matching dput() for d_find_alias().  Move d_find_alias() down a bit
at Julia's suggestion.

[ Introduced by commit 72466d0b92e0: "ceph: fix posix ACL hooks" ]

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@inktank.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-31 08:14:06 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig 7585823619 ceph: simplify ceph_{get,init}_acl
- ->get_acl only gets called after we checked for a cached ACL, so no
   need to call get_cached_acl again.
 - no need to check IS_POSIXACL in ->get_acl, without that it should
   never get set as all the callers that set it already have the check.
 - you should be able to use the full posix_acl_create in CEPH

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
2014-01-30 19:26:17 -08:00
Sage Weil 72466d0b92 ceph: fix posix ACL hooks
The merge of commit 7221fe4c2e ("ceph: add acl for cephfs") raced with
upstream changes in the generic POSIX ACL code (eg commit 2aeccbe957
"fs: add generic xattr_acl handlers" and others).

Some of the fallout was fixed in commit 4db658ea0c ("ceph: Fix up after
semantic merge conflict"), but it was incomplete: the set_acl
inode_operation wasn't getting set, and the prototype needed to be
adjusted a bit (it doesn't take a dentry anymore).

Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@inktank.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-29 16:05:28 -08:00
Linus Torvalds 4db658ea0c ceph: Fix up after semantic merge conflict
The previous ceph-client merge resulted in ceph not even building,
because there was a merge conflict that wasn't visible as an actual data
conflict: commit 7221fe4c2e ("ceph: add acl for cephfs") added support
for POSIX ACL's into Ceph, but unluckily we also had the VFS tree change
a lot of the POSIX ACL helper functions to be much more helpful to
filesystems (see for example commits 2aeccbe957 "fs: add generic
xattr_acl handlers", 5bf3258fd2 "fs: make posix_acl_chmod more useful"
and 37bc15392a "fs: make posix_acl_create more useful")

The reason this conflict wasn't obvious was many-fold: because it was a
semantic conflict rather than a data conflict, it wasn't visible in the
git merge as a conflict.  And because the VFS tree hadn't been in
linux-next, people hadn't become aware of it that way.  And because I
was at jury duty this morning, I was using my laptop and as a result not
doing constant "allmodconfig" builds.

Anyway, this fixes the build and generally removes a fair chunk of the
Ceph POSIX ACL support code, since the improved helpers seem to match
really well for Ceph too.  But I don't actually have any way to *test*
the end result, and I was really hoping for some ACK's for this.  Oh,
well.

Not compiling certainly doesn't make things easier to test, so I'm
committing this without the acks after having waited for four hours...
Plus it's what I would have done for the merge had I noticed the
semantic conflict..

Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Cc: Guangliang Zhao <lucienchao@gmail.com>
Cc: Li Wang <li.wang@ubuntykylin.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-28 18:06:18 -08:00
Guangliang Zhao 7221fe4c2e ceph: add acl for cephfs
Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao <lucienchao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Wang <li.wang@ubuntykylin.com>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
2013-12-31 20:32:01 +02:00