Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bill Pemberton e533a349c0 hwspinlock: remove use of __devexit
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit is no
longer needed.

Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-28 11:41:36 -08:00
Bill Pemberton 571291066d hwspinlock: remove use of __devinit
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer
needed.

Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-28 11:41:36 -08:00
Bill Pemberton 9eb26bddfc hwspinlock: remove use of __devexit_p
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer
needed.

Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-28 11:41:36 -08:00
Ohad Ben-Cohen 9efb4a1bb9 hwspinlock/omap: omap_hwspinlock_remove should be __devexit
Mark omap_hwspinlock_remove with __devexit (and use __devexit_p
appropriately) so the function can be discarded when the conditions are met.

Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
2011-09-21 19:57:45 +03:00
Ohad Ben-Cohen 300bab9770 hwspinlock/core: register a bank of hwspinlocks in a single API call
Hardware Spinlock devices usually contain numerous locks (known
devices today support between 32 to 256 locks).

Originally hwspinlock core required drivers to register (and later,
when needed, unregister) each lock separately.

That worked, but required hwspinlocks drivers to do a bit extra work
when they were probed/removed.

This patch changes hwspin_lock_{un}register() to allow a bank of
hwspinlocks to be {un}registered in a single invocation.

A new 'struct hwspinlock_device', which contains an array of 'struct
hwspinlock's is now being passed to the core upon registration (so
instead of wrapping each struct hwspinlock, a priv member has been added
to allow drivers to piggyback their private data with each hwspinlock).

While at it, several per-lock members were moved to be per-device:
1. struct device *dev
2. struct hwspinlock_ops *ops

In addition, now that the array of locks is handled by the core,
there's no reason to maintain a per-lock 'int id' member: the id of the
lock anyway equals to its index in the bank's array plus the bank's
base_id.
Remove this per-lock id member too, and instead use a simple pointers
arithmetic to derive it.

As a result of this change, hwspinlocks drivers are now simpler and smaller
(about %20 code reduction) and the memory footprint of the hwspinlock
framework is reduced.

Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
2011-09-21 19:45:34 +03:00
Ohad Ben-Cohen c3c1250e93 hwspinlock/core/omap: fix id issues on multiple hwspinlock devices
hwspinlock devices provide system-wide hardware locks that are used
by remote processors that have no other way to achieve synchronization.

To achieve that, each physical lock must have a system-wide id number
that is agreed upon, otherwise remote processors can't possibly assume
they're using the same hardware lock.

Usually boards have a single hwspinlock device, which provides several
hwspinlocks, and in this case, they can be trivially numbered 0 to
(num-of-locks - 1).

In case boards have several hwspinlocks devices, a different base id
should be used for each hwspinlock device (they can't all use 0 as
a starting id!).

While this is certainly not common, it's just plain wrong to just
silently use 0 as a base id whenever the hwspinlock driver is probed.

This patch provides a hwspinlock_pdata structure, that boards can use
to set a different base id for each of the hwspinlock devices they may
have, and demonstrates how to use it with the omap hwspinlock driver.

While we're at it, make sure the hwspinlock core prints an explicit
error message in case an hwspinlock is registered with an id number
that already exists; this will help users catch such base id issues.

Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
2011-09-21 19:45:32 +03:00
Ohad Ben-Cohen c97f6dd0fe hwspinlock/omap: simplify allocation scheme
Instead of allocating every hwspinlock separately, allocate
them all in one shot.

This both simplifies the driver and helps achieving better
slab utilization.

Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
2011-09-21 19:45:32 +03:00
Ohad Ben-Cohen e467b64214 hwspinlock/core: simplify 'owner' handling
Use struct device_driver's owner member instead of asking drivers to
explicitly pass the owner again.

This simplifies drivers and also save some memory, since there's no
point now in maintaining a separate owner pointer per hwspinlock.

Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
2011-09-21 19:45:32 +03:00
Simon Que 70ba4cc26b drivers: hwspinlock: add OMAP implementation
Add hwspinlock support for the OMAP4 Hardware Spinlock device.

The Hardware Spinlock device on OMAP4 provides hardware assistance
for synchronization between the multiple processors in the system
(dual Cortex-A9, dual Cortex-M3 and a C64x+ DSP).

[ohad@wizery.com: adapt to hwspinlock framework, tidy up]
Signed-off-by: Simon Que <sque@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Hari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T <balajitk@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
2011-02-17 09:52:03 -08:00