Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version this program is distributed in the
hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even
the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you
should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along
with this program if not write to the free software foundation inc
59 temple place suite 330 boston ma 02111 1307 usa
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-or-later
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1334 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.113240726@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Bart Massey reported what turned out to be a usercopy whitelist false
positive in JFS when symlink contents exceeded 128 bytes. The inline
inode data (i_inline) is actually designed to overflow into the "extended
area" following it (i_inline_ea) when needed. So the whitelist needed to
be expanded to include both i_inline and i_inline_ea (the whole size
of which is calculated internally using IDATASIZE, 256, instead of
sizeof(i_inline), 128).
$ cd /mnt/jfs
$ touch $(perl -e 'print "B" x 250')
$ ln -s B* b
$ ls -l >/dev/null
[ 249.436410] Bad or missing usercopy whitelist? Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'jfs_ip' (offset 616, size 250)!
Reported-by: Bart Massey <bart.massey@gmail.com>
Fixes: 8d2704d382 ("jfs: Define usercopy region in jfs_ip slab cache")
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>
Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
The ioctls were already compatible except for the actual values so this
was fairly easy to do.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Removed trailing spaces & tabs, and spaces preceding tabs.
Also a couple very minor comment cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
(cherry picked from f74156539964d7b3d5164fdf8848e6a682f75b97 commit)
ext2 inode attributes with relevance for jfs:
'a' EXT2_APPEND_FL -> append only
'i' EXT2_IMMUTABLE_FL -> immutable file
's' EXT2_SECRM_FL -> zero file
'u' EXT2_UNRM_FL -> allow for unrm
'A' EXT2_NOATIME_FL -> no access time
'D' EXT2_DIRSYNC_FL -> dirsync
'S' EXT2_SYNC_FL -> sync
overview of jfs flags (partially for OS/2)
value (OS/2) Linux ext2 attrs
------------------------------------------------
0x00010000 IFJOURNAL -
0x00020000 ISPARSE used
0x00040000 INLINEEA used
0x00080000 - - JFS_NOATIME_FL
0x00100000 - - JFS_DIRSYNC_FL
0x00200000 - - JFS_SYNC_FL
0x00400000 - - JFS_SECRM_FL
0x00800000 ISWAPFILE - JFS_UNRM_FL
0x01000000 - - JFS_APPEND_FL
0x02000000 IREADONLY - JFS_IMMUTABLE_FL
0x04000000 IHIDDEN - -
0x08000000 ISYSTEM - -
0x10000000 - -
0x20000000 IDIRECTORY used
0x40000000 IARCHIVE -
0x80000000 INEWNAME -
the implementation is straight forward, except
for the fact that the attributes have to be mapped
to match with the ext2 ones to avoid a separate
tool for manipulating them (this could be avoided
when using a separate flag field in the on-disk
representation, but the overhead is minimal)
a special jfs_ioctl is added to allow for the new
JFS_IOC_GETFLAGS and JFS_IOC_SETFLAGS calls.
a helper function jfs_set_inode_flags() to transfer
the flags from the on-disk version to the inode
minor changes to allow flag inheritance on inode
creation, as well as a cleanup of the on-disk
flags (including the new ones)
beforementioned helper to map between ext2 and jfs
versions of the new flags ...
the JFS_SECRM_FL and JFS_UNRM_FL are not done yet
and I'm not 100% sure they are worth the effort,
the rest seems to work out of the box ...
Signed-off-by: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Thomas Gleixner