Commit Graph

1002 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bard Liao 7b31ec2a01 ASoC: core: only convert non DPCM link to DPCM link
[ Upstream commit 607fa205a7 ]

Additional checks for valid DAIs expose a corner case, where existing
BE dailinks get modified, e.g. HDMI links are tagged with
dpcm_capture=1 even if the DAIs are for playback.

This patch makes those changes conditional and flags configuration
issues when a BE dailink is has no_pcm=0 but dpcm_playback or
dpcm_capture=1 (which makes no sense).

As discussed on the alsa-devel mailing list, there are redundant flags
for dpcm_playback, dpcm_capture, playback_only, capture_only. This
will have to be cleaned-up in a future update. For now only correct
and flag problematic configurations.

Fixes: 218fe9b7ec ("ASoC: soc-core: Set dpcm_playback / dpcm_capture")
Suggested-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200608194415.4663-3-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-06-24 17:50:42 +02:00
Pierre-Louis Bossart 4104faaeed ASoC: soc-core: disable route checks for legacy devices
commit a22ae72b86 upstream.

v5.4 changes in soc-core tightened the checks on soc_dapm_add_routes,
which results in the ASoC card probe failing.

Introduce a flag to be set in machine drivers to prevent the probe
from stopping in case of incomplete topologies or missing routes. This
flag is for backwards compatibility only and shall not be used for
newer machine drivers.

Example with an HDaudio card with a bad topology:

[ 236.177898] skl_hda_dsp_generic skl_hda_dsp_generic: ASoC: Failed to
add route iDisp1_out -> direct -> iDisp1 Tx

[ 236.177902] skl_hda_dsp_generic skl_hda_dsp_generic:
snd_soc_bind_card: snd_soc_dapm_add_routes failed: -19

with the disable_route_checks set:

[ 64.031657] skl_hda_dsp_generic skl_hda_dsp_generic: ASoC: Failed to
add route iDisp1_out -> direct -> iDisp1 Tx

[ 64.031661] skl_hda_dsp_generic skl_hda_dsp_generic:
snd_soc_bind_card: disable_route_checks set, ignoring errors on
add_routes

Fixes: daa480bde6 ("ASoC: soc-core: tidyup for snd_soc_dapm_add_routes()")
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200309192744.18380-2-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-02 08:49:01 +02:00
Daniel Baluta 5585d2a989 ASoC: soc-core: Set dpcm_playback / dpcm_capture
commit 218fe9b7ec upstream.

When converting a normal link to a DPCM link we need
to set dpcm_playback / dpcm_capture otherwise playback/capture
streams will not be created resulting in errors like this:

[   36.039111]  sai1-wm8960-hifi: ASoC: no backend playback stream

Fixes: a655de808c ("ASoC: core: Allow topology to override machine driver FE DAI link config")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204151333.26625-1-daniel.baluta@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-01-17 19:48:17 +01:00
Bard liao 7a5d9815cc
ASoC: core: use list_del_init and move it back to soc_cleanup_component
commit a0a4bf57a9 ("ASoC: core: delete component->card_list in soc_remove_component only")
was trying to fix a kernel oops when list_del was called twice without
re-init the list. Use list_del_init() can solve it, too. Besides, it
will be more readable if we cleanup all component related resource at
soc_cleanup_component().

Suggested-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190918133131.15045-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-20 12:05:46 +01:00
Bard Liao a0a4bf57a9
ASoC: core: delete component->card_list in soc_remove_component only
We add component->card_list in the end of soc_probe_component(). In
other words, component->card_list will not be added if there is an
error in the soc_probe_component() function. So we can't delete
component->card_list in the error handling of soc_probe_component().

Fixes: 22d1423187 ("ASoC: soc-core: add soc_cleanup_component()")
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190916210353.6318-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-17 16:56:38 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto e8fbd25052
ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_unbind_aux_dev()
Current soc_unbind_aux_dev() implementation is very half,
thus it is very unreadable.

	for_each_comp_order(order) {
		for_each_card_auxs_safe(card, comp, _comp) {

(1)			if (comp->driver->remove_order == order) {
				...
=>				soc_unbind_aux_dev(comp);
			}
	}

soc_unbind_aux_dev() itself is not related to remove_order (1).
And, it is called from soc_remove_aux_devices(), even though
its paired function soc_bind_aux_dev() is called from
snd_soc_instantiate_card().
It is very unbalance, and very difficult to understand.

This patch do
1) update soc_bind_aux_dev() to self contained
2) call it from soc_cleanup_card_resources() to make up balance

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r24wor0z.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:04:15 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 4893a2eb34
ASoC: soc-core: add soc_unbind_aux_dev()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

soc-core.c has soc_bind_aux_dev(), but, there is no its paired
soc_unbind_aux_dev().
This patch adds soc_unbind_aux_dev().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sgpcor14.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:03:59 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto bee886f1ea
ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_bind_aux_dev()
Current soc_bind_aux_dev() implementation is very half,
thus it is very unreadable.

	for_each_card_pre_auxs(xxx) {
=>		ret = soc_bind_aux_dev(xxx);
		...
	}

This patch does all for_each_xxx() under soc_bind_aux_dev(),
and makes it to self contained.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tv9sor1b.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:03:44 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto bc7c16c226
ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_link_dais() next to soc_remove_link_dais()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

This patch moves soc_probe_link_dais() next to soc_remove_link_dais()
which is paired function.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87v9u8or1g.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:03:28 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto c7e73774f2
ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_probe_link_dais()
Current soc_probe_link_dais() implementation is very half,
thus it is very difficult to read.

	for_each_comp_order(xxx) {
		for_each_card_rtds(xxx)
=>			soc_probe_link_dais(xxx);
	}

This patch does all for_each_xxx() under soc_probe_link_dais(),
and makes it to self contained.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87woeoor1m.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:03:13 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto c4b4698291
ASoC: soc-core: add new soc_link_init()
Current soc_probe_link_dais() (1) is called under probe_order (2),
and it will initialize dai_link related settings at *Last* turn (3)(B).
It is very complex code.

	static int soc_probe_link_dais(..., order)
	{
(A)		/* probe DAIs here */
		...

(3)		if (order != SND_SOC_COMP_ORDER_LAST)
			return 0;

(B)		/* initialize dai_link related settings */
		...
	}

	static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(...)
	{
		...
(2)		for_each_comp_order(order) {
			for_each_card_rtds(...) {
(1)				ret = soc_probe_link_dais(..., order);
			}
		}
	}

This patch separes soc_probe_link_dais() into "DAI probe" portion (A),
and dai_link settings portion (B).
The later is named as soc_link_init() by this patch.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2z4or1r.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:02:57 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto a7d44f7806
ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

This patch moves soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai() which is
paired function.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zhjkor1x.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:02:41 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 4ca47d21bf
ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_remove_link_dais()
Current soc_remove_link_dais() implementation is very half,
thus it is very difficult to read.

	for_each_comp_order(xxx) {
		for_each_card_rtds(xxx)
=>			soc_remove_link_dais(xxx);
	}

This patch does all for_each_xxx() under soc_remove_link_dais(),
and makes it to self contained.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/871rwwq5mm.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:02:23 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto b006c0c6ed
ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_remove_link_components()
Current soc_remove_link_components() implementation is very half,
thus it is very difficult to read.

	for_each_comp_order(xxx) {
		for_each_card_rtds(xxx)
=>			soc_remove_link_components(xxx);
	}

This patch does all for_each_xxx() under soc_remove_link_components(),
and makes it to self contained.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8736hcq5ms.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:02:04 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 62f07a6b6d
ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_probe_link_components()
Current soc_probe_link_components() implementation is very half,
thus it is very difficult to read.

	for_each_comp_order(xxx) {
		for_each_card_rtds(xxx) {
=>			ret = soc_probe_link_components(xxx);
			...
		}
	}

This patch does all for_each_xxx() under soc_probe_link_components(),
and makes it to self contained.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/874l1sq5mx.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-09 11:01:45 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 04f770d968
ASoC: soc-core: add comment to jack at soc_remove_component()
Basically, driver which setups snd_soc_component_set_jack() need
to release it by themselves. But, as framework level robustness,
soc_remove_component() also releases it.

To avoid code reader confuse, this patch makes it clarify.

This patch makes it clarify.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zm8q5n8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-04 13:48:58 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 6fb0355029
ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_link_components() position
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

soc_probe_link_components() has paired soc_remove_link_components(),
but, these are implemented at different place.
So it is difficult to confirm code.
This patch moves soc_probe_link_components() next to
soc_remove_link_components().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o90g7lbd.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-02 13:21:46 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 95c267dd20
ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_dapm_init()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

soc-dapm has snd_soc_dapm_free() which cleanups debugfs, widgets, list.
But, there is no paired initialize function.
This patch adds snd_soc_dapm_init() and initilaizing dapm

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pnkw7lbj.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-02 13:21:20 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto b614beafa4
ASoC: soc-core: dapm related setup at one place
Current ASoC setups some dapm related member at
snd_soc_component_initialize() which is called when component was
registered, and setups remaining member at soc_probe_component()
which is called when component was probed.
This kind of setup separation is no meanings, and it is very
difficult to read and confusable.
This patch setups all dapm settings at one place.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r25c7lbo.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-02 13:21:02 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto ffd60fba19
ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_component() position
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

soc_probe_comonent() has paired soc_remove_comonent(),
but, these are implemented at different place.
So it is difficult to confirm code.
This patch moves soc_probe_component() next to
soc_remove_component().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sgps7lbt.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-02 13:20:06 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 9a7c9fe120
ASoC: soc-core: add soc_rtd_free()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

soc_rtd_init() was soc_post_component_init(), but there was no
its paired soc_post_component_free(), but it is done at
soc_remove_link_dais().
This means it is difficult to find related code.

This patch adds soc_rtd_free() which is paired soc_rtd_init().
soc_rtd_xxx() will be more cleanuped in the future.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tva87lby.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-09-02 13:19:48 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 542694df75
ASoC: soc-core: rename soc_post_component_init() to soc_rtd_init()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

From function name point of view, "soc_post_component_init()" sounds
like "component initialize function".
But in reality it is rtd setup function.

This patch renames soc_post_component_init() to soc_rtd_init()

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87v9uo7lc3.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-23 11:35:07 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 495efdb01f
ASoC: soc-core: initialize list at one place
Initialize component related list at random place is very difficult
to read. This patch initialize it at snd_soc_component_initialize().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2zozazp.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-22 18:35:03 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 8d92bb5168
ASoC: soc-core: initialize component list
It might return without initializing in error case.
In such case, uninitialized variable might be used at error handler.
This patch initializes all necessary variable before return.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zhk4zazt.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-22 18:31:58 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto a4de83a385
ASoC: soc-core: soc_cleanup_card_resources() become void
There is no need to check return value for
soc_cleanup_card_resources(). Let't makes it as void.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/871rxg1lda.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-22 18:30:00 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto a33c0d166c
ASoC: soc-core: add NOTE to snd_soc_rtdcom_lookup()
We can find specified name component via snd_soc_rtdcom_lookup().
But, it is not enough under multi CPU/Codec/Platform, because many
components which have same driver name might be connected to same rtd.

Not using this function as much as possible is best solution,
but some drivers are already deeply depended to it.

We can expand this function, for example having "num" which specifies
found order at parameter, etc (In such case, it need to have fixed
probing order).
Or, use different driver name in such component, etc.

We will have such issue if multi CPU/Codec/Platform were supported.
To indicate it, this patch adds NOTE to this function.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/874l2c1ldi.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-22 18:29:43 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 4168ddabb4
ASoC: soc-core: use device_register()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.

soc-core.c is using device_unregiser(), but there is no its paired
device_regiser(). We can find its code at soc_post_component_init()
which is using device_initialize() and device_add().
Here, device_initialize() + device_add() = device_register().

	-- linux/drivers/base/core.c --
	int device_register(struct device *dev)
	{
		device_initialize(dev);
		return device_add(dev);
	}

device_initialize() is doing each dev member's initialization only,
not related to device parent/release/groups.
Thus, we can postpone it.
let's use device_register() instead of device_initialize()/device_add().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878sro1ldw.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-22 18:29:26 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto c26a884111
ASoC: soc-core: remove unneeded dai_link check from snd_soc_remove_dai_link()
snd_soc_remove_dai_link() has card connected dai_link check. but
	1) we need to call list_del() anyway,
	   because it is "remove" function,
	2) It is doing many thing for this card / dai_link already
	   before checking dai_link.

This patch removes poinless dai_link check

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zms1ldm.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-21 13:11:37 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto b03bfaec1d
ASoC: soc-core: merge snd_soc_initialize_card_lists()
snd_soc_initialize_card_lists() is doing card related
INIT_LIST_HEAD(), but, it is already doing at
snd_soc_register_card(). We don't need to do it separately.
This patch merges these.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e781ldq.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-21 13:11:12 +01:00
Peter Ujfalusi 72b745e3ad
ASoC: core: Move pcm_mutex up to card level from snd_soc_pcm_runtime
The pcm_mutex is used to prevent concurrent execution of snd_pcm_ops
callbacks. This works fine most of the cases but it can not handle setups
when the same DAI is used by different rtd, for example:
pcm3168a have two DAIs: one for Playback and one for Capture.
If the codec is connected to a single CPU DAI we need to have two dai_link
to support both playback and capture.

In this case the snd_pcm_ops callbacks can be executed in parallel causing
unexpected races in DAI drivers.

By moving the pcm_mutex up to card level this can be solved
while - hopefully - not breaking other setups.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190813104532.16669-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-15 15:07:43 +01:00
YueHaibing 0faf1237c6
ASoC: soc-core: Fix -Wunused-const-variable warning
If CONFIG_DMI is not set, gcc warns:

sound/soc/soc-core.c:81:27: warning:
 dmi_blacklist defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]

Add #ifdef guard around it.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190813142501.13080-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-15 15:03:21 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto c2b71c7103
ASoC: soc-core: add for_each_xxx macro for aux_dev
To be more readable code, this patch adds
new for_each_xxx() macro for aux_dev.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ftmc6w8s.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 18:13:58 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto a48b561d87
ASoC: soc-core: remove legacy style of aux_dev
Now all drivers are using snd_soc_dai_link_component for aux_dev.
Let's remove legacy style

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87h86s6w8x.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 18:12:37 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 3dc29b8b20
ASoC: soc-core: support snd_soc_dai_link_component for aux_dev
To find aux_dev, ASoC is using .name, codec_name, codec_of_node.
Here, .name is used to fallback in case of no codec.

But, we already have this kind of component finding method by
snd_soc_dai_link_component and soc_find_component().
We shouldn't have duplicated implementation to do same things.
This patch adds snd_soc_dai_link_component support to finding aux_dev.

Now, no driver is using only .name.
All drivers are using codec_name and/or codec_of_node.
This means no driver is finding component from .name so far.
(Actually almost all drivers are using .name as just "device name",
 not for finding component...)

This patch
1) add snd_soc_dai_link_component support for aux_dev. legacy style will
   be removed if all drivers are switched to new style.
2) try to find component via snd_soc_dai_link_component.
   Then, it doesn't try to find via .name, because no driver is using
   it so far.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87y3046wcf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 18:12:27 +01:00
Pierre-Louis Bossart 0e36f36b04
ASoC: soc-core: fix module_put() warning in soc_cleanup_component
The recent changes introduce warnings in the SOF load/unload module
tests. The code does not seem balanced with a confusion between
_close() and _remove() macros. Using _remove() fixes the issue and
removes the warning.

Suggested-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 4a81e8f30d ('ASoC: soc-component: add snd_soc_component_get/put()')
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190808025131.32482-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-08 20:56:59 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 596becd3f8
ASoC: soc-core: dai_link check under soc_dpcm_debugfs_add()
soc_dpcm_debugfs_add(rtd) is checking rtd->dai_link pointer,
but, rtd->dai_link->dynamic have been already checked before calling it.

	static int soc_probe_link_dais(...) {
		dai_link = rtd->dai_link;
		...
=>		if (dai_link->dynamic)
=>			soc_dpcm_debugfs_add(rtd);
		...
	}

	void soc_dpcm_debugfs_add(rtd)
	{
=>		if (!rtd->dai_link)
			return;
		...
	}

These pointer checks are strange/pointless.
This patch checks dai_link->dynamic under soc_dpcm_debugfs_add().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/874l2tahnq.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-08 20:56:58 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto ee5b3f1141
ASoC: soc-core: define soc_dpcm_debugfs_add() for non CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
soc_dpcm_debugfs_add() is implemented at soc-pcm.c under CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.
Thus, soc-core.c which is only user of it need to use CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, too.

This patch defines soc_dpcm_debugfs_add() for non CONFIG_DEBUG_FS case.
Then, we can remove #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS from soc-core.c

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zn9ahnv.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-08 20:56:57 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto b3da42519c
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup for card->deferred_resume_work
card->deferred_resume_work is used if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was defined.
but
	1) It is defined even though CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was not defined
	2) random ifdef code is difficult to read.
This patch tidyup these issues.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e7paho1.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-08 20:56:56 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto b245d273cb
ASoC: soc-core: remove unneeded list_empty() check for snd_soc_try_rebind_card()
list_for_each_entry_safe() will do nothing if it was empty list.
This patch removes unneeded list_empty() check for
list_for_each_entry_safe().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878ss5aho6.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-08 20:56:56 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto d8ca7a0a85
ASoC: soc-core: call snd_soc_dapm_debugfs_init() at soc_init_card_debugfs()
We have 2 soc_init_card_debugfs() implementations for with/without DEBUG_FS.
But, snd_soc_instantiate_card() calls snd_soc_dapm_debugfs_init() under
ifdef DEBUG_FS after soc_init_card_debugfs(). This is very strange.
We can call snd_soc_dapm_debugfs_init() under soc_init_card_debugfs().

	#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
=>	static void soc_init_card_debugfs(...)
	{
		...
	}
	...
	#else
=>	static inline void soc_init_card_debugfs(...)
	{
		...
	}
	#endif

	static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(struct snd_soc_card *card)
	{
		...
=>		soc_init_card_debugfs(card);

*	#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
*		snd_soc_dapm_debugfs_init(&card->dapm, card->debugfs_card_root);
*	#endif
	}

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a7clahob.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-08 20:56:55 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 9b98c7c2a0
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup for snd_soc_add_card_controls()
snd_soc_add_card_controls() registers controls by using
for(... i < num; ...). If controls was NULL, num should be zero.
Thus, we don't need to check about controls pointer.
This patch also cares missing return value.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87blx1ahoi.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-08 20:56:54 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto daa480bde6
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup for snd_soc_dapm_add_routes()
snd_soc_dapm_add_routes() registers routes by using
for(... i < num; ...). If routes was NULL, num should be zero.
Thus, we don't need to check about route pointer.
This patch also cares missing return value.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87d0hhahon.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-08 20:56:53 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto e6d7020c29
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup for snd_soc_add_component_controls()
snd_soc_add_component_controls() registers controls by using
for(... i < num; ...). If controls was NULL, num should be zero.
Thus, we don't need to check about controls pointer.
This patch also cares missing return value.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ef1xahor.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-08 20:56:52 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto b8ba3b572c
ASoC: soc-core: tidyup for snd_soc_dapm_new_controls()
snd_soc_dapm_new_controls() registers controls by using
for(... i < num; ...). It means if widget was NULL, num should be zero.
Thus, we don't need to check about widget pointer.
This patch also cares missing return value.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ftmdahow.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-07 14:25:58 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 32d2c172fe
ASoC: soc-core: reuse rtdcom at snd_soc_rtdcom_add()
snd_soc_rtdcom_add() is using both "rtdcom" and "new_rtdcom" as
variable name, but these are not used at same time.
Let's reuse rtdcom.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87h86tahp2.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-07 14:25:54 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 4284906450
ASoC: soc-core: don't use for_each_card_links_safe() at snd_soc_find_dai_link()
It doesn't removes list during loop at snd_soc_find_dai_link().
We don't need to use _safe loop.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87imr9ahp9.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-07 14:25:50 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 5b99a0aad0
ASoC: soc-core: check return value of snd_soc_add_dai_link()
snd_soc_add_dai_link() might return error, we need to check it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87k1bpahpd.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-07 14:25:47 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 6634e3d6ea
ASoC: soc-core: add comment for for_each_xxx
soc-core has many for_each_xxx, but it is a little bit
difficult to know which list is relead to which for_each_xxx.
This patch adds missing comment for it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfw5ahpj.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-07 14:25:41 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto ad64bfbd09
ASoC: soc-core: set component->debugfs_root NULL
To be more safety code, let's set NULL to component->debugfs_root
when it was cleanuped.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87muglahq0.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-07 14:25:28 +01:00
Kuninori Morimoto 7951b14611
ASoC: soc-component: move snd_soc_component_set_bias_level()
Current soc-dapm / soc-core are using a long way round to call
.set_bias_level.

	if (driver->set_bias_level)
		dapm->set_bias_level = ...;
	...
	if (dapm->set_bias_level)
		ret = dapm->set_bias_level(...);

We can directly call it via driver->set_bias_level.
One note here is that both Card and Component have dapm,
but, Card's dapm doesn't have dapm->component.
We need to check it.

This patch moves snd_soc_component_set_bias_level() to soc-component.c
and updates parameters.
dapm->set_bias_level is no longer needed

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tvb94d0n.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-08-05 16:24:17 +01:00