Socket callbacks use svc_xprt_enqueue() to add an xprt to a
pool->sp_sockets list. In normal operation a server thread will later
come along and take the xprt off that list. On shutdown, after all the
threads have exited, we instead manually walk the sv_tempsocks and
sv_permsocks lists to find all the xprt's and delete them.
So the sp_sockets lists don't really matter any more. As a result,
we've mostly just ignored them and hoped they would go away.
Which has gotten us into trouble; witness for example ebc63e531c
"svcrpc: fix list-corrupting race on nfsd shutdown", the result of Ben
Greear noticing that a still-running svc_xprt_enqueue() could re-add an
xprt to an sp_sockets list just before it was deleted. The fix was to
remove it from the list at the end of svc_delete_xprt(). But that only
made corruption less likely--I can see nothing that prevents a
svc_xprt_enqueue() from adding another xprt to the list at the same
moment that we're removing this xprt from the list. In fact, despite
the earlier xpo_detach(), I don't even see what guarantees that
svc_xprt_enqueue() couldn't still be running on this xprt.
So, instead, note that svc_xprt_enqueue() essentially does:
lock sp_lock
if XPT_BUSY unset
add to sp_sockets
unlock sp_lock
So, if we do:
set XPT_BUSY on every xprt.
Empty every sp_sockets list, under the sp_socks locks.
Then we're left knowing that the sp_sockets lists are all empty and will
stay that way, since any svc_xprt_enqueue() will check XPT_BUSY under
the sp_lock and see it set.
And *then* we can continue deleting the xprt's.
(Thanks to Jeff Layton for being correctly suspicious of this code....)
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
b4f36f88b3