commit f51e50db4c upstream.
boundary->width and boundary->height are sizes relative to
boundary->left and boundary->top coordinates, but they were not being
taken into consideration to adjust r->left and r->top, leading to the
following error:
Consider the follow as initial values for boundary and r:
struct v4l2_rect boundary = {
.left = 100,
.top = 100,
.width = 800,
.height = 600,
}
struct v4l2_rect r = {
.left = 0,
.top = 0,
.width = 1920,
.height = 960,
}
calling v4l2_rect_map_inside(&r, &boundary) was modifying r to:
r = {
.left = 0,
.top = 0,
.width = 800,
.height = 600,
}
Which is wrongly outside the boundary rectangle, because:
v4l2_rect_set_max_size(r, boundary); // r->width = 800, r->height = 600
...
if (r->left + r->width > boundary->width) // true
r->left = boundary->width - r->width; // r->left = 800 - 800
if (r->top + r->height > boundary->height) // true
r->top = boundary->height - r->height; // r->height = 600 - 600
Fix this by considering top/left coordinates from boundary.
Fixes: ac49de8c49 ("[media] v4l2-rect.h: new header with struct v4l2_rect helper functions")
Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # for v4.7 and up
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
9cbcbfc67b