linux/tools/testing
Stanislav Fomichev 740f8a6572 selftests/bpf: make sure signal interrupts BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN
Simple test that I used to reproduce the issue in the previous commit:
Do BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with max iterations, each program is 4096 simple
move instructions. File alarm in 0.1 second and check that
bpf_prog_test_run is interrupted (i.e. test doesn't hang).

Note: reposting this for bpf-next to avoid linux-next conflict. In this
version I test both BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER (which uses generic
bpf_test_run implementation) and BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR (which has
it own loop with preempt handling in bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector).

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-25 22:24:19 +01:00
..
fault-injection
ktest
nvdimm nfit_test: fix security state pull for nvdimm security nfit_test 2019-01-21 09:56:29 -08:00
radix-tree radix tree: Don't return retry entries from lookup 2018-12-06 08:26:16 -05:00
scatterlist
selftests selftests/bpf: make sure signal interrupts BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN 2019-02-25 22:24:19 +01:00
vsock