Dan Carpenter 1491e30ed1 ncpfs: don't allow negative timeouts ... This code causes a static checker warning because it's a user controlled variable where we cap the upper bound but not the lower bound. Let's return an -EINVAL for negative timeouts. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unneeded `else'] Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>		2015-11-20 16:17:32 -08:00
..
dir.c	fs/ncpfs/dir.c: remove unnecessary new_valid_dev() check	2015-11-09 15:11:24 -08:00
file.c	switch generic_write_checks() to iocb and iter	2015-04-11 22:30:21 -04:00
getopt.c
getopt.h
inode.c	VFS: normal filesystems (and lustre): d_inode() annotations	2015-04-15 15:06:57 -04:00
ioctl.c	ncpfs: don't allow negative timeouts	2015-11-20 16:17:32 -08:00
Kconfig
Makefile
mmap.c
ncp_fs_i.h
ncp_fs_sb.h
ncp_fs.h
ncplib_kernel.c	VFS: normal filesystems (and lustre): d_inode() annotations	2015-04-15 15:06:57 -04:00
ncplib_kernel.h
ncpsign_kernel.c
ncpsign_kernel.h
sock.c
symlink.c	VFS: normal filesystems (and lustre): d_inode() annotations	2015-04-15 15:06:57 -04:00