7b6be8444e
We want dax capable drivers to be able to publish a set of dax operations [1]. However, we do not want to further abuse block_devices to advertise these operations. Instead we will attach these operations to a dax device and add a lookup mechanism to go from block device path to a dax device. A dax capable driver like pmem or brd is responsible for registering a dax device, alongside a block device, and then a dax capable filesystem is responsible for retrieving the dax device by path name if it wants to call dax_operations. For now, we refactor the dax pseudo-fs to be a generic facility, rather than an implementation detail, of the device-dax use case. Where a "dax device" is just an inode + dax infrastructure, and "Device DAX" is a mapping service layered on top of that base 'struct dax_device'. "Filesystem DAX" is then a mapping service that layers a filesystem on top of that same base device. Filesystem DAX is associated with a block_device for now, but perhaps directly to a dax device in the future, or for new pmem-only filesystems. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/19/880 Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| accounting | ||
| arch | ||
| build | ||
| cgroup | ||
| firewire | ||
| gpio | ||
| hv | ||
| iio | ||
| include | ||
| kvm/kvm_stat | ||
| laptop | ||
| leds | ||
| lguest | ||
| lib | ||
| net | ||
| nfsd | ||
| objtool | ||
| pcmcia | ||
| perf | ||
| power | ||
| scripts | ||
| spi | ||
| testing | ||
| thermal/tmon | ||
| time | ||
| usb | ||
| virtio | ||
| vm | ||
| Makefile | ||