900cf086fd
So I spent a while pounding my head against my monitor trying to figure out the vmsplice() vulnerability - how could a failure to check for *read* access turn into a root exploit? It turns out that it's a buffer overflow problem which is made easy by the way get_user_pages() is coded. In particular, "len" is a signed int, and it is only checked at the *end* of a do {} while() loop. So, if it is passed in as zero, the loop will execute once and decrement len to -1. At that point, the loop will proceed until the next invalid address is found; in the process, it will likely overflow the pages array passed in to get_user_pages(). I think that, if get_user_pages() has been asked to grab zero pages, that's what it should do. Thus this patch; it is, among other things, enough to block the (already fixed) root exploit and any others which might be lurking in similar code. I also think that the number of pages should be unsigned, but changing the prototype of this function probably requires some more careful review. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
allocpercpu.c | ||
backing-dev.c | ||
bootmem.c | ||
bounce.c | ||
dmapool.c | ||
fadvise.c | ||
filemap_xip.c | ||
filemap.c | ||
fremap.c | ||
highmem.c | ||
hugetlb.c | ||
internal.h | ||
Kconfig | ||
madvise.c | ||
Makefile | ||
memcontrol.c | ||
memory_hotplug.c | ||
memory.c | ||
mempolicy.c | ||
mempool.c | ||
migrate.c | ||
mincore.c | ||
mlock.c | ||
mmap.c | ||
mmzone.c | ||
mprotect.c | ||
mremap.c | ||
msync.c | ||
nommu.c | ||
oom_kill.c | ||
page_alloc.c | ||
page_io.c | ||
page_isolation.c | ||
page-writeback.c | ||
pagewalk.c | ||
pdflush.c | ||
prio_tree.c | ||
quicklist.c | ||
readahead.c | ||
rmap.c | ||
shmem_acl.c | ||
shmem.c | ||
slab.c | ||
slob.c | ||
slub.c | ||
sparse-vmemmap.c | ||
sparse.c | ||
swap_state.c | ||
swap.c | ||
swapfile.c | ||
thrash.c | ||
tiny-shmem.c | ||
truncate.c | ||
util.c | ||
vmalloc.c | ||
vmscan.c | ||
vmstat.c |