selinux_setprocattr() does ptrace_parent(p) under task_lock(p), but task_struct->alloc_lock doesn't pin ->parent or ->ptrace, this looks confusing and triggers the "suspicious RCU usage" warning because ptrace_parent() does rcu_dereference_check(). And in theory this is wrong, spin_lock()->preempt_disable() doesn't necessarily imply rcu_read_lock() we need to access the ->parent. Reported-by: Evan McNabb <emcnabb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
include | ||
ss | ||
.gitignore | ||
Kconfig | ||
Makefile | ||
avc.c | ||
exports.c | ||
hooks.c | ||
netif.c | ||
netlabel.c | ||
netlink.c | ||
netnode.c | ||
netport.c | ||
nlmsgtab.c | ||
selinuxfs.c | ||
xfrm.c |