linux/fs/ecryptfs
Christoph Hellwig 6cfd014842 push BKL down into ->put_super
Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller.  A couple of
filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of
s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs,
hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment.  Most
of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually.
Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area.

[AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are
removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super()
now]
[AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt]

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11 21:36:07 -04:00
..
crypto.c eCryptfs: Fix data corruption when using ecryptfs_passthrough 2009-04-22 03:54:13 -05:00
debug.c
dentry.c
ecryptfs_kernel.h eCryptfs: Remove ecryptfs_unlink_sigs warnings 2009-04-22 04:08:46 -05:00
file.c
inode.c eCryptfs: Fix min function comparison warning 2009-04-27 13:31:12 -05:00
Kconfig
keystore.c
kthread.c
main.c Convert obvious places to deactivate_locked_super() 2009-05-09 10:49:40 -04:00
Makefile
messaging.c
miscdev.c
mmap.c eCryptfs: Fix data corruption when using ecryptfs_passthrough 2009-04-22 03:54:13 -05:00
read_write.c eCryptfs: Fix data corruption when using ecryptfs_passthrough 2009-04-22 03:54:13 -05:00
super.c push BKL down into ->put_super 2009-06-11 21:36:07 -04:00